Sony's most recent Android phones are almost certainly the most enjoyable point the Japanese company has accomplished in the smartphone arena to date. I imply, Sony unveiled a flagship cellphone that is drinking water and dustproof.* (to a single meter for up to thirty minutes.)
That by itself is something deserving of awareness. The sister system, the ZL, is a slightly downmarket model of the mobile phone, although even expressing that a lot isn't just reasonable. You can find nothing especially worse about the ZL, other than the fact that it lacks the glass backing of the Z, or its tolerance for moist and sandy circumstances.
In actuality, a lot of people many prefer the ZL - its headphone and microUSB ports are exposed, while each and every obtain level on the Z is guarded by a watertight address that has to be pried open to access the respective port. I, for a single, significantly favor exposed ports. Obviously, the Z wo uld not be really water-proof if these access points were being open up to air, even though, and which is aspect of the tradeoff, I suppose.
Each the Z and ZL have 5 " 1080p Liquid crystal display displays, and Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Professional quad- main processors. Equally have LTE assist, and Sony's brand -new Exmos RS 13MP camera sensor. Equally operate Android 4. 1. two with Sony's (admittedly dated) UI overlay.
So, what had been my original impressions? The components of the Z is gorgeous - I enjoy Sony's elegant, minimalist layout aesthetic. The front of the cellphone isn't really at quite at the ZL, I'd argue, but that is certainly nitpicking since both are pretty comparable. The again of the Z is notably lovely - just one smooth slab of glass, although the ZL's is a little bit a lot more drab, and sports a rather conspicuous faux-chrome ring all around the rear camera lens. Nonetheless, equally phones are much from unattractive. I have explained it before, I am going to say it again : Sony knows how to make an sophisticated mobile phone.
On the application facet, both equally phones felt markedly speedier than the last large - conclude Sony system I applied, the Xp eria TX ( equivalent to the Xperia T). When the bump to a quad- core processor has sped issues up a bit, Sony's Z and ZL merely felt sluggish when set up towards the opposition. Compared to HTC's most modern hardware, they are likely on about the very same amount. When compared to Samsung's, it's no contest: Sony's application is incredibly naturally guiding the curve, and it is a essential blow to the splendid hardware they have paired it with. HTC is supposedly remedying this in Perception 5 ( expected this year, possibly at MWC), but for Sony, there appears to be no rescue in sight. Sony's been using the same tired - wanting skin due to the fact Gingerbread, and it certainly has to go, and so does its lackluster efficiency.
We didn't get a chance to check out the digital camera, while interestingly adequate, the electronic viewfinder relayed video from the rear digital camera at 60FPS on the display - which was type of awesome. And on that subject matter, while the ZL has a hardware digital camera button, the Z does not. Which is sort of odd ( might yet again have to do with that dust/waterproofing).
The two phones are coming out afterwards this 12 months, the ZL only in decide on marketplaces, with the Z predicted to launch throughout the world - at the earliest - in late Q1, probably Q2.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar